Add blowup sharpness section
This commit is contained in:
parent
a10aa7f7d1
commit
b35824e35d
|
@ -107,3 +107,20 @@ The printer gate may hold 8mm film and the printer camera 16mm, or vice versa.
|
||||||
With a `M = 2` setup an 8mm original frame is photographed onto a whole 16mm frame.
|
With a `M = 2` setup an 8mm original frame is photographed onto a whole 16mm frame.
|
||||||
With an `M = 1/2` setup a whole 16mm original frame is photographed onto an 8mm frame.
|
With an `M = 1/2` setup a whole 16mm original frame is photographed onto an 8mm frame.
|
||||||
Conversion between any two film gauges is possible this way, provided the frames have the sane proportions, as 8mm, super 8mm, 16mm, and some 35mm do.
|
Conversion between any two film gauges is possible this way, provided the frames have the sane proportions, as 8mm, super 8mm, 16mm, and some 35mm do.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## BLOWUP SHARPNESS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A 16mm picture of a flea can be just as sharp as a 16mm picture of an elephant.
|
||||||
|
But a 16mm picture of an 8mm picture cannot be expected to be as sharp
|
||||||
|
as a 16mm picture of a 16mm picture.
|
||||||
|
Pictures differ from things in having very limited detail.
|
||||||
|
The 16mm blowup, even if it preserves all the pictorial detail of the 8mm original, spreads it out, so the blowup is less sharp absolutely than the original.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Under extreme magnification--a microscope objective could be the printer lens--pictorial detail is diffuse and the underlying natural thing, the emulsion, is all that could be photographed sharply.
|
||||||
|
But the grains are too small to be sharply imaged with light.
|
||||||
|
Here even the natural thing has been photographically exhausted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An 8mm original blown up to 16mm and projected will appear sharper than the same 8mm original optically printed onto 8mm and projected.
|
||||||
|
If the blowup optics are good this is even true when the 1:1 printing is by contact.
|
||||||
|
Likewise for 16mm to 35mm.
|
||||||
|
(This is all due to the print film being in effect twice as sharp and half as grainy in a bigger frame.)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue