1691 lines
62 KiB
Plaintext
1691 lines
62 KiB
Plaintext
|
= NOTES ON OPTICAL PRINTER TECHNIQUE
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Magnification 1 Fadea in Original 14
|
|||
|
Blowup.& Reduotion 2 Chart C: Neutral Déneity and
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Blowup Sharpness 2 Equivalent Shutter
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Printer Lenses 3 Angle 15
|
|||
|
Optical Zoom 3 Image Superposition 16
|
|||
|
Lene Aperture 3 Gamma # Bipack 16
|
|||
|
Focusing 4 Incidentally 16
|
|||
|
Focusing Aperture 4 Exposure Compensation 18
|
|||
|
Focusing Precision 4 Special Originals 18
|
|||
|
Focusing Target 4 Texturing 18
|
|||
|
Depth of Field 4 Multi-Exposure 19
|
|||
|
Bolex Priam 4 Multi-Pack 19
|
|||
|
Bolex Groundglass 4 Natural Superposition 19
|
|||
|
Defecus 4 Flashing 19
|
|||
|
X-Y Adjustment 4 Contrast Adjustment 19
|
|||
|
Exact 13:1 5 Color Image Superposition 20
|
|||
|
Ainframe 5 Weighted Double Exposures 20
|
|||
|
Franelines 6 Dissolves 21
|
|||
|
Emulsion Position T Effects Dissolves 2}
|
|||
|
Time 8 Fades from Negative 21
|
|||
|
Fancy Freeze 8 Color Exposure 22
|
|||
|
Fancy Slow 8 Testing 22
|
|||
|
Diffusers 8 CC Pack Reduction 25
|
|||
|
UV Filter 9 High Contrast Printa 25
|
|||
|
IR Filter 9 Hicon Exposure 26
|
|||
|
Green Filter 3 Contrast Building Steps 26
|
|||
|
Filter Location 9 Hicon Speckle 26
|
|||
|
Exposure 9 Tone Isolation 27
|
|||
|
Exposure Adjusters 9 Logie of Mask Combination 27
|
|||
|
Specifying Exposure 11 Image Spread and Bloom 27
|
|||
|
Film Speed 11 Mask and Countermask 28
|
|||
|
Right Exposure 1 Reversal/Negative Fitting 28
|
|||
|
Generations 2 Feathered Maska 29
|
|||
|
Bellows Formula 13 Image Marriage 2g
|
|||
|
Fades 13 Mask Blacknesé 30
|
|||
|
Log Fade 14 Hicona from Color Originals 30
|
|||
|
Bolex Variable Shutter 14 Hicon Processing 30
|
|||
|
Linear Fade 14 Optical Printed Release Prints 31
|
|||
|
Other Fades 14 Ritual and Art 31
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
i on
|
|||
|
| revisec .
|
|||
|
NOTES ON OPTICAL PRINTER TECHNIQUE
|
|||
|
DENNIS COUZIN
|
|||
|
March 1983
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
An optical printer 18 a device for photographing the frames
|
|||
|
of one film sco as to make another filn.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
e 2 - . ,
|
|||
|
I
|
|||
|
Cc
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It consists essentially of @ camera (C) connected by a
|
|||
|
bellows (B) to a lens (L) aimed at a film in a gate (G) illuminated
|
|||
|
from behind by a lamp (I).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The camera and gate each have motorized intermittant filin
|
|||
|
movements so that any frame of the "original" film can be
|
|||
|
conveniently photographed onto any frame of the "print" filo.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The camera can be an ordinary cine camera, less its lens,
|
|||
|
and the gate can be an ordinary cine projector, less its lens.
|
|||
|
Ideally they have identical syatemsa of film registration, aa if
|
|||
|
one Were the lens’ image of the other. The lens can be any
|
|||
|
bellows mountable lens. Ideally it ie specially corrected for
|
|||
|
the amall and nearly equal sizes of this object and image.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The camera and the lens can elide independently to and fro
|
|||
|
the film gate. Thie adjustea the magnification and the focus of
|
|||
|
the photography.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MAGNIFICATION If the lens is (nominally) midway between the films
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
when one is focused on the other, then the magnification
|
|||
|
is 1. At M=1 (also called 1:1} the whole of the original
|
|||
|
frame 1s photographed at a size which fllis the whole
|
|||
|
of the print frame.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
i ) oY ?
|
|||
|
If the lens 18 moved closer to the gate, then the
|
|||
|
camera must be moved back, farther from the gate,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
_ to keep the one film focused on the other. Then the
|
|||
|
Copyright (1983 by Dennie Couzin
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
r
|
|||
|
2
|
|||
|
magnification is greater than 1. At M>1 a part of the
|
|||
|
original frame is photographed at a size which fille the
|
|||
|
whole of the print frame.
|
|||
|
If, starting from the 1:1! setup, the lene is moved
|
|||
|
farther from the gate, then the camera must also be
|
|||
|
moved back, farther from the gate, to keep the one film
|
|||
|
focused on the other. Then the magnification is loser
|
|||
|
than 1. At M<1! the whole of the original frame is
|
|||
|
photographed at a size wohich does not fill the whole
|
|||
|
of the print frame. The remainder of the print frane
|
|||
|
46 filled with a photograph of the gate as it surrounds
|
|||
|
the original frame (ideslly perfectly black).
|
|||
|
6 y
|
|||
|
For each position of the lens there is exactly one
|
|||
|
correct (focused) position for the camera. But for
|
|||
|
each position of the camera (except the 13:1 position)
|
|||
|
there are two correct positions for the lens. One
|
|||
|
gives M>1, the other M<}.
|
|||
|
BLOWUP & REDUCTION The printer gate may hold Smm film and the printer
|
|||
|
camera 16mm, or vice versa. With ap M=2 setup an
|
|||
|
Sum original frame 18 photographed onto a whole
|
|||
|
1énm frame. With an M=¢t setup a whole !6um original
|
|||
|
frame is photographed onto an Smm frame. Conversion
|
|||
|
between any two film gauges 4s possible thia way,
|
|||
|
provided the frames have the sane proportions, as
|
|||
|
Sum, super San, 16mm, and some 55ma do.
|
|||
|
BLOWUP SHARPNESS A 16mm picture of a flea can be just as sharp ae
|
|||
|
@ 16mm picture of an elephant. Fut & \é6an picture
|
|||
|
of an Smm picture cannot be expected to be as sharp
|
|||
|
as a t6mn picture of a 16mm picture. Pictures differ
|
|||
|
. from thinge in having very limited detail. The 16as
|
|||
|
blawup, even if it preserven all the pictorial detail
|
|||
|
of the mm original, spreads it out, so the blowup
|
|||
|
ie less sharp absolutely than the original.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
,
|
|||
|
3
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Under extreme magnification -- a microscope objec
|
|||
|
eould be the printer lene -- pictorial detail i: diffuse
|
|||
|
and the underlying natural thing, the enulsion, is all
|
|||
|
that could be photographed sharply. But the grains are
|
|||
|
too small to be sharply imaged with light. Here even
|
|||
|
the natural thing haa been photographically exhausted,
|
|||
|
an 8mm original blown up to 16mm and projected will
|
|||
|
appear sharper than the sane 8mm original optically
|
|||
|
printed onto Smm and projected. If the blowup optics
|
|||
|
are good thie is even true when the 1:1 printing is by
|
|||
|
contact. Likewise for 16mm to 35mm. (This ie all due
|
|||
|
to the print film being in effect twice as sharp and
|
|||
|
half as grainy in a bigger frame.)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
PRINTER LENSES A lens well-corrected for M-1 is less well-corrected
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
for M=? (or M=t). A lene Wwell-corrected for M=2 is
|
|||
|
leas wall-corrected for M=4 (or M=%). Etc. (Floating
|
|||
|
elementea improve this.) A lens well-corrected for M=1
|
|||
|
for a larger format is lees than ideal for M-1 for a
|
|||
|
smaller format. With such specialization (and expense)
|
|||
|
in optical printer optics what ie the hope for the
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
$50 SOmm enlarger lens, optimized for M=.1 and much too
|
|||
|
large a format? Wot bac, provided the sharpest aperture
|
|||
|
ie found and heeded and focusing technique is eine.
|
|||
|
Aleo, for Mé! ano asyunetrical lens should be mounted
|
|||
|
the right way, which is usually with its smaller glass
|
|||
|
facing the smaller image.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A very sharp cheap printer lens is the Canon Macrophoto
|
|||
|
35mm £/2.8.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OPTICAL ZOOM Optical printers do not use soom lenses, although they could.
|
|||
|
An optical printer toom is made by moving the camera and
|
|||
|
lene each frame, so as to vary magnification while holding
|
|||
|
focus. It is a dolly shot! A dolly abot is equivalent
|
|||
|
to a toom for a flat subject.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Geometrically this zoom oan be identical to a zoom had
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
it been made in the original photography. It can also
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
be deviant, by tracking not to the center of the frame.
|
|||
|
Pictorially the zoom gets grainy, showing that it was
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
not made in the original photography.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Rather than focua at each frame, camera am lene positions
|
|||
|
can be precharted for, say, every 10th frame, and the other
|
|||
|
positions interpolated or computed. On the J-E, counting
|
|||
|
the turns of the lead screw ie a means of repeatable
|
|||
|
positioning. A follo¥-focus sechanian is @ boon to optical
|
|||
|
Z£oons.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The rate and course of s00ming is a factor of style,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
as it is in original cinematography.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
LESS APERTURE” For picture taking the printer lens should be at whichever
|
|||
|
aperture gives the sharpest pictures. This 4e found in
|
|||
|
teste. If a lens must be atopped down past f/8 to reach
|
|||
|
optimum it is a terrible printer lene.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
F
|
|||
|
4
|
|||
|
FOCUSING Printer focusing procedure is different at different magnifi
|
|||
|
At 1:1 the camera, not the lens, 4e moved for focusing,’ Gulp)
|
|||
|
at magnifications greater than about 1.4 18 it better to nove
|
|||
|
the lens for focusing.
|
|||
|
Near the t:1 setup lens motion has no focusing effect. With
|
|||
|
the camera fixed in its 1:1 position lens motion: adjusts
|
|||
|
magnification between about M=.96 and M=1.04 (at f/5.6).
|
|||
|
FOCUSING APERTURE With all but the best optical printer lenses either
|
|||
|
(1) foous at the taking aperture or (2) foous at a
|
|||
|
larger aperture and then shift focus by a pre-established
|
|||
|
distance before taking. This "fudge-factor" is found in
|
|||
|
film teate.
|
|||
|
FOCUSING PRECISION Especially when focusing stopped dowm, focus many
|
|||
|
times (perhaps 20) and set an average position.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FOCUSING TARGET Use whatever target ie found eablest to focus on.
|
|||
|
One caution: the fudge-factor is target dependent.
|
|||
|
Very fine resolution targete may require different
|
|||
|
fudge factora than coarser targete do.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DEPTH OF FIELD at indicated f/5.6 there is already more than enough
|
|||
|
depth of field for a4 bipack, at 1:1. dAleo it ig unnecessary
|
|||
|
to refocus when adding the second film. Likewlee when
|
|||
|
a single film ie reversed’ emulsion to base. At larger
|
|||
|
apertures and at larger magnifications depth of field
|
|||
|
is lese.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
BOLEX PRISM It isn't a worry. There len't a distinetion between RX
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
lenees and non-RX lenses for most any lens which will be
|
|||
|
used on a bellows for optical printing.
|
|||
|
BOLEX GROUNDGLASS Only for the best optical printer lenses, which will
|
|||
|
be used at apertures larger than f/4, does the Bolex
|
|||
|
groundglass need to be reset from its everyday position.
|
|||
|
DEFOCUS To throw an image out of focua without changing ite size, if
|
|||
|
printing at i:1, move the camera 4 distance and the lens ¢ this
|
|||
|
dietance, in the same direction.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
X-Y ADJUSTMENT Besides its to and fro movement the lene haa lateral
|
|||
|
movements. These adjust the position of the original
|
|||
|
frame's image on the print frame. For example, if the
|
|||
|
lens is raised a bit...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5
|
|||
|
At 1:1 moving the lens up a distance d raises the viewed
|
|||
|
field by twice 4d. Likewise for down, right, and left.
|
|||
|
At M>1 lateral adjustment effects a scan of the original
|
|||
|
frame. This is not geometrically equivalent to a pan,
|
|||
|
bad it been made in the original photography,
|
|||
|
On simple optical printers the only lateral ad Justment
|
|||
|
is of the lens (rather than the heavier camera or gate).
|
|||
|
Thie is Geometrically adequate.
|
|||
|
But the J-K adjustments are even too flimsy for a lens.
|
|||
|
It helps, after they are set, to gently tap the lens, ac
|
|||
|
it finds a stable position, and then to readjust if
|
|||
|
necessary, etc., etc.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EXACT 1:1 The lateral movements of the lens, the to-fro movements of
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the lens and camera, and a tilting of the camera (if necessary)
|
|||
|
allow the optical printer to be set for exact 1:1 reproduction.
|
|||
|
Then the printed image is the same aize and in the same position
|
|||
|
as the original image. If the printer lacks a tilt adjustment
|
|||
|
the oamera may be shinmed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
AIMFRAME A Special frame is made to guide the exact 1:1 setup. To make
|
|||
|
an "aimframe" use the optical printer camera (though not
|
|||
|
necessarily with the optical printer lens) to photograph a
|
|||
|
target which is epecially drawn to contain detaila exactly’
|
|||
|
coinciding, as seen through the camera eyepiece, with details
|
|||
|
permanently on the groundglass. The photograph made while the
|
|||
|
coincidence is seen is the ainfrane.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Every groundglass has some permanent detaile, even if only ite
|
|||
|
flaws. The field edge is a poor choice of detail if the mask
|
|||
|
is thick or if the eyepiece is aberrated at the edge. Two
|
|||
|
points of detail are enough for a well~aligned printer, three
|
|||
|
pointe for a suspect one.
|
|||
|
A reticle made on high resolution film may be attached to the
|
|||
|
groundglass to add details. Small patterns of concentric circles
|
|||
|
and other patterns which self-moiré are ideal. also the ainframe
|
|||
|
can be a negative of the fine-patterned reticle.
|
|||
|
For exact 1:1! setup, the aimframe film is registered in the
|
|||
|
printer gate and the printer camera and lens adjusted to
|
|||
|
achieve that same coincidence of details, as seen through
|
|||
|
the eyepiece. Focusing must be completed before the final
|
|||
|
adjustment to the aimframe. It is convenient to incorporate
|
|||
|
a focusing target in the aimframe.
|
|||
|
The aimframe has validity only for the camera in which it was
|
|||
|
made. It does not depend on the accuracy of the camera'a
|
|||
|
reflex viewing eystem, only the stability of the eysten.
|
|||
|
Whenever there is doubt about the validity of the aimfrane,
|
|||
|
such as after a camera repair or because of wear to the filn,
|
|||
|
the old aimframe can be registered in the printer gate, aimed
|
|||
|
on, .and photographed to make a newly valid aimframe.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For rotoscoping with primitive contrapLions, an aimframe may
|
|||
|
be projected and drawn. This drawing is later used to aim
|
|||
|
the camera (whose aimframe it was) when photographing the
|
|||
|
rotoscoped drawings.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fo
|
|||
|
6
|
|||
|
The 1:1 accuracy of optical printing with aimframe setups ie
|
|||
|
limited by 1. the precision in the making and then in the use
|
|||
|
of the aimnfraze,
|
|||
|
2. the precision in the film registration mechanians
|
|||
|
of camera and gate,
|
|||
|
3. only if the two mechanieme are different, the
|
|||
|
precision in the film dimensions (perforation
|
|||
|
and alitting).
|
|||
|
Btep contact printing, Buch 48 by bipacking in the optical printer
|
|||
|
eamera, if & convenient method for making exact 1:1 reproductions.
|
|||
|
It must give exposures which are exact 1:1, but there 18 then sone
|
|||
|
shrinkage in processing. Optical printing with the ainfrane methoc
|
|||
|
compensates for processing shrinkage. Shrinkage errore are too
|
|||
|
apall to matter with simple printers.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
GAMEFRAME A atrip of identical frames, shot in the optical printer camera,
|
|||
|
is cut in two and registered in both the printer gate (upright,
|
|||
|
eanulgion away from lene) and the camera gate (ae it was shot).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The coincidence of detaile of image and sameframe is viewed throug
|
|||
|
an opening in the rear of a special pressure plate. <A prismatic
|
|||
|
gate focuser may be pubstituted for the pressure plate, but only
|
|||
|
the most positive registration systems will be unaffected by this.
|
|||
|
Only the most solid optical printers will allow loading the carers
|
|||
|
without diesturblog thé setup.
|
|||
|
The sameframe method does not compensate for processing shrinkage.
|
|||
|
FRAMELINES If the camera which made the original film had a frameline
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
much higher or lower than that of the printer camera, then
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the vertical adjustment of the lene should deviate from the
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
aimframe setup, to compensate for thia. Otherwise the print
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
will have a very thick, or even 4 double frameline.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sometimes the sole reason for optical printing is to ad juat
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the height of the frameline of an original fim shot with
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a Wayward camera. Sometimes it is to simulate such filo.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Then the printer camera must have ite frameline adjusted.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For a Bolex thie is a simple claw exchange (revertible).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To make a frameline adjustzent, 4f the reflex viewfinder is
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
well-set, then even if it does not view the full frame, the
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
vertical adjustment can be made until the upper framelins
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
just appears, then until the lower frageline just appears,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
and the two adjustments averaged.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
If the reflex viewfinder is untrustworthy, then a camera
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
gate focuser can be used. Or thia method: register in ye
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
printer gate a bipack of the original with any file ahot in
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the printer camera. Determine how much vertical adjuetaent
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
separates their framelines. Make that puch adjustment to
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the aimfrane setup.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The framelines of the original can always be eliminated
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
from the print by setting the magnification slightly greater
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
than 1..
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
7
|
|||
|
EMULSION POSITION A priori, a film of an alphabet could be any of these
|
|||
|
eight ways.
|
|||
|
F lh
|
|||
|
F Sc G
|
|||
|
¢||e FE
|
|||
|
F F
|
|||
|
Ia Ib IIa IIb
|
|||
|
—__ —— ls
|
|||
|
4 4 5 2
|
|||
|
12) |
|
|||
|
o 4 a
|
|||
|
IIIa IIIb IVa IVb .
|
|||
|
Each sketch showa emulsion facing out. For doubie
|
|||
|
perf film there are only four ways. The a and b ways
|
|||
|
become the sane.
|
|||
|
Camera original is IIIa. *
|
|||
|
A contact print from camera original is Ib.
|
|||
|
A contact print from a contact print from canera
|
|||
|
original is IIIa again. Etc.
|
|||
|
All the othere are shams ~-- either optical printing
|
|||
|
errors or elae films of alphabets somehow reversed.
|
|||
|
Given a double perforated I, II, III, or IV it is easy
|
|||
|
to make a double perforated optical print whioh ia
|
|||
|
any of the four.
|
|||
|
Single perforated filme are a pain in the side. Given,
|
|||
|
for example, IIIa, it ia possible with a usual optical
|
|||
|
printer to make either Ib, IIb, IIIa, or IVa, but none
|
|||
|
of the other four. These could be made via a double
|
|||
|
perforated intermediate. With a priem or other image
|
|||
|
rotator, or a special reversed gate, it ie possible
|
|||
|
to convert any of the eight ways to any of the elght ways
|
|||
|
Figuring out how to do these is a good exercise for
|
|||
|
the student.
|
|||
|
The two non-sham emulsion positione are aketched again,
|
|||
|
thie time with emulelona facing 1n shown dotted.
|
|||
|
a O-— a o—4
|
|||
|
- re o-— F
|
|||
|
oS G G 6
|
|||
|
oOo ats o—— on
|
|||
|
CAMERA ORIGINAL CONTACT PRINT FROM
|
|||
|
. CAMERA ORIGINAL
|
|||
|
- Notice that when pietmres "read right" single perfs are
|
|||
|
, on the left, and “before” .is above.
|
|||
|
Notice that camera original reads right with emulsion
|
|||
|
facing away. Contact print of camera original reads
|
|||
|
right with emulsion facing toward the viewer.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
8
|
|||
|
Except when optical printing is done in alliance with
|
|||
|
contact printing, it is usual to maintain emulsion
|
|||
|
position through ali optical printing etepa. Atarting
|
|||
|
with camera original each generation ie again IIIa.
|
|||
|
For this there is a simple rule.
|
|||
|
To reproduce the emulsion position of the original,
|
|||
|
insert it in the printer gate with emulsion away
|
|||
|
from lene, heads up, running upward.
|
|||
|
Optical printing "through the base" does not degrade
|
|||
|
image quality.
|
|||
|
The optical printer can also imitate the contact printer,
|
|||
|
if the original is inserted in the printer gate with
|
|||
|
enulsion toward the lens.
|
|||
|
TIME The optical printer gives as absolute oontrol over the flow or fits
|
|||
|
of time as the gods could have. But it's just a movie.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Actually, two limitations on optical printer’time manipulation are
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the grainy ground of film pictures and the mere 24 frames per second,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
as show by these two examples.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FANCY FREEZE A single frame of the original printed repeatedly is a
|
|||
|
freaze frame. Unfortunately the running graiu pattern
|
|||
|
of the original freezes with the picture. The picture
|
|||
|
has lost its ground. This can be avoided if there are
|
|||
|
at least three frames without motion in the original, by
|
|||
|
alternately printing among the three.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FANCY SLOW To slow motion to 3/4 speed (as is required when original
|
|||
|
shot at 182pe is to be made into a 24fps print) it is usual
|
|||
|
to print every third frame twice. ABCDEFGHI... becomes
|
|||
|
ABCCDEFFGHII... . The micro-freezes, juat two frames long,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
. coming every 1/6 second, are perceived through their rhythn.
|
|||
|
This oan be avoided by randomizing the frames to be doubled
|
|||
|
while still ohoosing one frame from each three of the original.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DIFFUSERS For poorly designed condenser systems a diffuser will even
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the illumination over the frame.
|
|||
|
Other than for this, diffusers are located immediately
|
|||
|
behind the original film to alter image quality in several
|
|||
|
ways:
|
|||
|
1. reduce the appearance of scratches on the film base;
|
|||
|
2. soften the appearance of grain, and without reducing
|
|||
|
resolution per se, reduce sharpness;
|
|||
|
3. reduce the apparent oontrast of B&W originals,
|
|||
|
approximating the tonality in contact printing.
|
|||
|
Opal glass, a more extreme diffuser than groundglaasa, is
|
|||
|
more effective in each of the three Ways.
|
|||
|
An opal glase oan reiuce exposure by 4 or even more stops.
|
|||
|
An accidental or for;otten opal glass can devastate an exposure!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
9
|
|||
|
UV FILTER 4 filter which absorbs the ultraviolet, such as Wratten 25
|
|||
|
or 2E improves sharpness with almost all lenses.
|
|||
|
Also, printing oolor film onto color film, or BEéW film onto
|
|||
|
color film, there is color reproduction advantage to using
|
|||
|
a UV filter.
|
|||
|
Some color rawstooks have such filtration built in, some don't,
|
|||
|
Even printing color film onto B&W film there is tonal advantage
|
|||
|
to using a UV filter.
|
|||
|
IR FILTER A filter which absorbs (or reflects) the infrared keeps much
|
|||
|
of the light energy which would heat the original but not
|
|||
|
contribute to the photography, off the original. Thia filter
|
|||
|
must be located between the lamp and the original.
|
|||
|
Printing Kodachrome original onto color film, there is color
|
|||
|
reproduction advantage to using a filter which reflects the
|
|||
|
far red (past 670nm) and near infrared. Printing other color
|
|||
|
originals there is color reproduction disadvantage to using
|
|||
|
a filter (such as many heat filters) which remove the far red.
|
|||
|
GREEN FILTER Printing B&W to B&W with a nOn-apochromatic lena, a green
|
|||
|
filter can improve sharpness.
|
|||
|
FILTER LOCATION The spectral effect of a filter on the photography is
|
|||
|
the same wherever it ia looated between the lamp and
|
|||
|
the rawatock. The optical effect of a filter can't be
|
|||
|
good, #o it ought to be located on the illumination side
|
|||
|
of the original rather than on the image-formation side.
|
|||
|
(There, flawe in filters are harmless. A color filter
|
|||
|
may even be perforated to reduce its effective saturation. }
|
|||
|
EXPOSURE In optical printing as in original photography, the expoaure ig
|
|||
|
adjustable, and a necessary consideration. But there is a
|
|||
|
differenoe. The natural scene may exhibit an immenes brightness
|
|||
|
range, from the brightest light sources (and secondary sources --
|
|||
|
reflections) to the darkest light sinks. The film original
|
|||
|
4s limited in brightness rangs, between the clear of the base
|
|||
|
and the maximum density of the amulsion. This could be an
|
|||
|
11 atop range for some color reversal fllms, but only about
|
|||
|
6 atops for a negative original.
|
|||
|
The exposure problem in original photography is to decide what
|
|||
|
portion of the immense brightness range to capture on the filn.
|
|||
|
The exposure problem in optical printing is to decide how to
|
|||
|
capture on the print film the whole of the original image range.
|
|||
|
EXPOSURE ADJUSTERS SHUTTER SPEED 4 variable speed motor or gearing can
|
|||
|
give a few atops of adjustment. Brevity is limited by
|
|||
|
inertia. <A single-frame mechaniem cannot be expected to
|
|||
|
complete a cycle in less than about .! second. Slow
|
|||
|
running ie unlimited, but emulsions miarespond to very
|
|||
|
~ long exposures, losing sepeed and gaining contrast.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
10
|
|||
|
With the variable shutter the shutter speed (the time
|
|||
|
the light etrikes a point in the frame) may be adjusted
|
|||
|
although the printer camera runs at just one speed.
|
|||
|
Exposure can be adjusted over eeveral stops with the
|
|||
|
variable shutter. Brevity 16 limited by the ehutter
|
|||
|
mechanics which must give equal even exposures at the
|
|||
|
smallest shutter angles.
|
|||
|
To cut exposure by 1 etop using the Variable shutter,
|
|||
|
halve the shutter angle. To cut another stop, halve
|
|||
|
it again.
|
|||
|
Uaing the variable shutter for exposure adjustment makes
|
|||
|
4te use for fades or dissolves inconvenient.
|
|||
|
LENS APERTURE This is a Billy way to adjust exposure.
|
|||
|
Changing lene aperture changes picture sharpness.
|
|||
|
Except for fine expoeure adjustments (t# stop) the
|
|||
|
lens ia beet left at ite sharpest opening.
|
|||
|
(For exposure testing and other dirty work, lens
|
|||
|
aperture 1a a handy exposure adjuster.)
|
|||
|
LAMP VOLTAGE This ie the classical way to adjust
|
|||
|
exposure for B&W printing. But it introducee eolor
|
|||
|
changee. Also, modern halogen lamps lose life at
|
|||
|
prolonged low voltages. Voltage adjustment is a
|
|||
|
practical means for fine exposure ad juetment.
|
|||
|
Dropping the voltage 10% reduces the light about t
|
|||
|
stop while changing the color about CCOSY¥+CCOecM.
|
|||
|
POLARIZERS Two polarizere, one rotatable, i8 a cute
|
|||
|
way to adjust exposure. But sheet polarizere get
|
|||
|
hot and have short lives in the optical printer.
|
|||
|
Only very expensive ones can maintain color neutrality
|
|||
|
i over a 10 stop adjustment range, and it is ead to
|
|||
|
fry then.
|
|||
|
ND FILTERS These grey filtere are the preferred
|
|||
|
way to adjust exposure.
|
|||
|
.30 of Neutral Density equala one etop.
|
|||
|
Neutral Density values add as filters are stacked.
|
|||
|
Thus an ND.10 filter + an ND.20 filter + an ND. 50
|
|||
|
filter works like an ND.60 filter, and thie cuts
|
|||
|
the light 2 atope. Etc.
|
|||
|
.10 of Neutral Density equals 1/3 stop.
|
|||
|
A clear glase or film may be ueed ae an ND.035 filter
|
|||
|
E for finer exposure ad justmente.
|
|||
|
Long, graded ND filters allow econtinuove expoaure
|
|||
|
adjustment.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ND filters of higher value become hotter and have
|
|||
|
ehorter lives. In a pack of ND filters, lower values
|
|||
|
should go toward the lamp. Past .60 it makea little
|
|||
|
difference.
|
|||
|
Wratten #96 gelatin ND filtere are expensive because
|
|||
|
of their optical quality, unnecessary Where they are
|
|||
|
located in the optical printer.
|
|||
|
Lee theatrical filters #209, #210, and #211 are good
|
|||
|
for ND.30, ND.60, and ND.90 and cost 1/100 as much as
|
|||
|
Wrattene.
|
|||
|
There are glass ND's, both absorptive and reflective,
|
|||
|
of great permanence. Also, developed B&W filmes, fine
|
|||
|
halftone screens, etc. can be used as ND filters.
|
|||
|
SPECIFYING EXPOSURE The many variables of exposure include:
|
|||
|
1. the type of original filn and ita pictorial qualitie
|
|||
|
2. the type of print film (and if a lab stock its
|
|||
|
batch number)
|
|||
|
3. magnification
|
|||
|
4, lena aperture
|
|||
|
5. diffuser (if any)
|
|||
|
6. lamp voltage
|
|||
|
7. shutter angle
|
|||
|
8. non-ND filtration
|
|||
|
as well as 9. ND filters
|
|||
|
FILM SPEED ABA and related values are specialized to original picture
|
|||
|
taking and are not quite appropriate to optical printer
|
|||
|
applications. The values are informative for comparison
|
|||
|
of similar atocks. For many printing filme 4SA and related
|
|||
|
values are undefinable.
|
|||
|
The optical printer will have exposure standards unto itself,
|
|||
|
determined by testing. Once it is known how to beat expose
|
|||
|
, a certain original onto a certain print film, good estimates
|
|||
|
can be made for similar originals or similar print films.
|
|||
|
RIGHT EXPOSURE Working in revereal there 18 a temptation to want the
|
|||
|
optical print to match the original. Resist this
|
|||
|
temptation! You want the optical print that produces
|
|||
|
the best release print.
|
|||
|
(Even if the optical print must be intercut with the
|
|||
|
original, so that the two must produce matching release
|
|||
|
print, it doeen't follow that the two must match, and
|
|||
|
they shouldn't.)
|
|||
|
Starting from reversal camera original the beet reversal
|
|||
|
. optical print ie typically a littie (about ND.20) Garker
|
|||
|
than the original. This avoids the print film's toe.
|
|||
|
, The best reversal optical print of thie will mateh it.
|
|||
|
And so on.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
t2
|
|||
|
Starting from negative camera Original the best interpositiy
|
|||
|
print has some density in the highlighte. The beat
|
|||
|
internegative ts a little darker than the origtnal négative.
|
|||
|
A further interpositive would best match the firat one, etc.
|
|||
|
GENERATIONS Gammas multiply. For example, @ gamma 1,5 Original printed
|
|||
|
onto gamma 2 etock resemblea a ganna 3 original,
|
|||
|
in @tany-generation pictorial Optical printing a chain of
|
|||
|
B400e 1 a@tene results in unchanging picture contrast.
|
|||
|
393 and CRI are gamma | color reversal stocks. 7243 18 a
|
|||
|
Fanma ? color negative atock. PXR and 7361 are ganna 1 B&W
|
|||
|
revergal etocka. 7235 16 a gamma t Baw negative stock.
|
|||
|
For B&W negative there is the option of alternating gamnas
|
|||
|
above and below 1 -- 7366 with gamma 1.4 and 7234 with Fanme
|
|||
|
-? -- and multiply out to 1.
|
|||
|
There are no available reversal stocks with Gamma less than 1,
|
|||
|
For color reversal ECO, until ite disappearance in 1985, was a
|
|||
|
favorite gamma 1! camera stock and ECO--ECO--ECO--atc. was the
|
|||
|
classical printing scheme. ECO--7399--7399--stc. was A eimilar,
|
|||
|
possibly better echeme. For each, only the release print would
|
|||
|
be on higher gamma stock. No present color reversal scheme has
|
|||
|
that advantage. Higher gamma original VEF-=-7399-=-7399--etc,
|
|||
|
18 a printing scheme. For this, the release print too will be
|
|||
|
on 7399. Original Kodachrome follows the VHF achene.
|
|||
|
7399 stock misbehavea with exposure times longer than about
|
|||
|
-1 second.
|
|||
|
For B&eW reversal PXR--PXR--PXR--ete. is the classical printing
|
|||
|
Scheme. PXR--7361--7361--eate. 4a a Similar, slightly better
|
|||
|
scheme. For each, unless an Cpal @iffuser ia used the effective
|
|||
|
gamma is much greater than t.
|
|||
|
For color negative ECN--7243--7243--ete. is the classical
|
|||
|
printing acheme. The alternating positive and necative pictures
|
|||
|
allow different manipulations. Optical printing from picture
|
|||
|
negative requires unusual cleanliness, to avoid white apecke
|
|||
|
in the final image. A food atratery La to make the odd printing
|
|||
|
atepa quick and simple, perhape even contact printed.
|
|||
|
The shortcut acheme for eolor negative ECN--CRI--CRI--ete.
|
|||
|
comprises only picture negatives.
|
|||
|
For B&W negative there ia a shortcut schene BWN--7361--7361--ete
|
|||
|
Tonal degradation sometimes confused with contrast increase
|
|||
|
may be due to misexposure, or to impossible exposure (as when
|
|||
|
the print film lacks the exposure range to handle the denaity
|
|||
|
range of the Original). Then picture falls on toe or shoulder
|
|||
|
; and ia tonally compressed.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
13
|
|||
|
Through generations graininess semi-adds. The grain of the
|
|||
|
original is in part added to the grain of the print stock.
|
|||
|
The print may thue look leas grainy than the original, or
|
|||
|
more grainy, or juet differently grainy.
|
|||
|
Through generations sharpness diminishes. The unsharpnegs of
|
|||
|
the original joins the unsharpneas of the lens and the unsharp-
|
|||
|
nesa of the print stock, in the print. Sharpnesa may be
|
|||
|
boosted, however, by boosting contrast.
|
|||
|
Optical printing with the best lenses onto relatively thick
|
|||
|
emulsion print films may be sharper than contact printing.
|
|||
|
Generally optical printing isn't as sharp.
|
|||
|
Picture degradation from generation to generation could be
|
|||
|
avoided by making the pictures very large, or by digitalizing
|
|||
|
them. But in thie medium the original, intermediate, and
|
|||
|
final pictures are all of the same eize, made in similar ways,
|
|||
|
of similar materials. Besides the practical economy, there
|
|||
|
ia conceptual economy in this. Intuitions transfer easily
|
|||
|
from one formally similar picture phase to another. Thus
|
|||
|
Making the generations the same makes them different. This
|
|||
|
is the paradox, or the folly, of optical printing.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
BELLOWS FORMULA Exposure way change with magnification. A "bellowa
|
|||
|
forgula" works for moet printer lenses and most 1illuminatio:
|
|||
|
systema. It prescribes...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
magnification compensation
|
|||
|
M=.13 add ND.50
|
|||
|
M=.18 add ND. 46
|
|||
|
M=.25 add ND. 41
|
|||
|
M=,35 add ND.34
|
|||
|
M=.50 add ND.25
|
|||
|
M=.71 add ND.14
|
|||
|
M=1 normal
|
|||
|
‘ _ remove ND.16
|
|||
|
er i M= remove ND.35
|
|||
|
Binsup Sper i -# N=2.8 remove ND.56
|
|||
|
M=4 rencve ND.S80
|
|||
|
M=5.7 remove ND1.04
|
|||
|
u-8 remove ND1.31
|
|||
|
FADES Pictures like things fade in many ways. Brightness fades are
|
|||
|
Gradual exposure changes leading to black, or, starting from black
|
|||
|
leading to normal exposure.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
o fade out with a positive original, exposure is decreased, either
|
|||
|
ty adding ND filtera to the normal pack or by closing the shutter,.
|
|||
|
some more each frame. When the ND added is somewhat darker than
|
|||
|
the black of the original, this counts as exposure cutoff.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
14
|
|||
|
To fade out with a negative original, with the same effect,
|
|||
|
exposure is increased, by subtracting ND filtere from the normal
|
|||
|
pack, some more each frame. When the ND subtracted ia somewhat
|
|||
|
darker than the black of the original, thia counts as exposure
|
|||
|
cutoff. Thia fade is imposaible without an abundant reserve of
|
|||
|
printer illumination. The normal pack must contain enough ND for
|
|||
|
the removal. 4n alternative is discussed below after dissolves.
|
|||
|
& fadein i6 the simple reverse of a fadecut.
|
|||
|
LOG FADE The traditional fade ia made from a positive and ta logarithmic.
|
|||
|
With ND fliters a log fadeout is made by adding each new frame
|
|||
|
a ocertain amount more ND. With revereal orlginal, 5.00 added
|
|||
|
about completes the fadeocut. For example, a 350 frame log
|
|||
|
fadeout ie made by adding .10 of ND each frame.
|
|||
|
For every ND value there is an equivalent shutter angle. Chart
|
|||
|
C below shows the equivalences and ia adaptable to any shutter,
|
|||
|
A Variable shutter could be callibrated in both degrees and
|
|||
|
ND's. But toward the bottom of Chart C the angular settings
|
|||
|
are too close for ordinary wariable shutters. Long smooth
|
|||
|
log fades from reversal original are difficult with variable
|
|||
|
ehutters. However, from interpositive original a fade ia
|
|||
|
finished at about ND1.60, avoiding the difficulty.
|
|||
|
BOLEX VARIABLE SHUTTER Although it is marked in stops, it is configured
|
|||
|
for angular callibration. Open is 130°. Just
|
|||
|
closed is 0°, Midway is 65°, Percentage of
|
|||
|
full can be substituted for degreea. Fine
|
|||
|
ecallibration should not be attempted for there
|
|||
|
is play in the mechanisaa.
|
|||
|
LINSAR FADE The linear fadeout, compared with the log fadeout of the
|
|||
|
sane length, starts slower and finishes faster.
|
|||
|
With a variable shutter a linear fadeout from a positive
|
|||
|
original 16 made by subtracting each new frame a certain
|
|||
|
angles. For aimplicity, take a jinear fadeout to be conplete
|
|||
|
at O°. For example, with a 180” shutter a 30 frame linear
|
|||
|
fade changes 6° each frame.
|
|||
|
ND filters can be used to make a linear fade. The fade
|
|||
|
is planned as if for a variable shutter and then ND
|
|||
|
equivalents are found in Chart C.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
OTHER FADES any gradual transition between full exposure and black
|
|||
|
4s an exposure fade. The "look", and perhaps the "meaning",
|
|||
|
of a fade depends on how the expoeure changes with the frames.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FaDES IN ORIGINAL A fade made fron a scene looks distinctly different
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
from one made from a film image of the scene if the
|
|||
|
scene containge bright highlights. Made from the acene,
|
|||
|
the highlights shine on when the remainger of the scene
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
~ is practically black. Made from the film, the highlighte
|
|||
|
follow the other light parte of the picture.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
sak] C NEUTRAL DENSITY AND EQUIVALENT SHUTTER ANGLE i
|
|||
|
PERCENT DEGREES DEGREES
|
|||
|
NEUTRAL OF FULL FOR 170° FOR °
|
|||
|
DENSITY SHUTTER SHUTTER SHUTTER
|
|||
|
0.00 100% 170°
|
|||
|
205 89.1% 152°
|
|||
|
«10 79.4% 135° ae
|
|||
|
-15 70.8% 120° =
|
|||
|
~20 63.1% 1079 oo
|
|||
|
225 56.2% 96° —==
|
|||
|
30 50.1¢ 95°
|
|||
|
235 44.7% 76° <==
|
|||
|
»40 39.8% 68° —
|
|||
|
45 35.5% 60° Sell
|
|||
|
50 31.6% 54°
|
|||
|
~55 28.2% 48°
|
|||
|
60 25, 1% 43°
|
|||
|
-65 22,48 38°
|
|||
|
-70 20.0% 34° ___
|
|||
|
75 17,84 30° ae
|
|||
|
.80 15, 8% 27°
|
|||
|
~85 14.1% 24°
|
|||
|
90 12.6% 21,40
|
|||
|
-95 11.2% 19,19 =
|
|||
|
1.00 10.0% 17.09
|
|||
|
1.05 8.91% 15.2°
|
|||
|
1.10 7.94% 13.59 aa
|
|||
|
1.15 7.052 12.0° =
|
|||
|
1.20 6.31% 10.7
|
|||
|
1.25 5.62% 9.6°
|
|||
|
1.30 5.01% 8.59 =a
|
|||
|
1.35 447% 7-60 aaa
|
|||
|
1.40 3.98% 6.8
|
|||
|
1.45 3.55% 6.0° — an
|
|||
|
1.50 3.16% 5.40
|
|||
|
1.55 2, 52% 4,89 _
|
|||
|
1.60 2.51% 4,30
|
|||
|
1.65 2.24% 3.80
|
|||
|
1.70 2.00% 3.45
|
|||
|
1.75 1.78% 3.0 _ a
|
|||
|
1.80 1.58% 2.7° ss
|
|||
|
1.85 1.41% 2,4°
|
|||
|
1.90 1.26% 2.149 _
|
|||
|
1.95 1.12% 1.91° ____
|
|||
|
2.00 1.00% 70° [==
|
|||
|
2.05 891% 1.52° ____
|
|||
|
2.10 ~ 794% 1.359
|
|||
|
2.15 . 708% 1, 20°
|
|||
|
2.20 .6312 1.079
|
|||
|
2.25 562% .96° ____.
|
|||
|
2.30 501% 2 Ee
|
|||
|
2.35 AATE 76 ____
|
|||
|
2.40 3985 68° o——— 7
|
|||
|
2.45 -355% -60° —————
|
|||
|
2.50 3162 «540 ———F
|
|||
|
2.55 . 2828 48° ——s
|
|||
|
“ 2.60 251% 43° —=
|
|||
|
2.65 2248 38 a
|
|||
|
2.70 . 200% . 34°
|
|||
|
2.75 .178% 30° _—
|
|||
|
2,80 158% . 27° =
|
|||
|
2.85 141% . 24° Sica
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a
|
|||
|
i **Refer to this chart when slanning linear fades and tissolveg++
|
|||
|
Equivalent Shutter Ovenines
|
|||
|
+N. % of Full Shutter 190° 130° Tz=7
|
|||
|
00 100 180 130 25
|
|||
|
05: 89.1 140 115 209
|
|||
|
.10 79.4 143 193 15¢
|
|||
|
215 70.8 127 92 15e
|
|||
|
~ .20 *3.1 114 82 148
|
|||
|
225 54,2 101 73 132
|
|||
|
-.30 (1 stop) 50.1 90 65 117
|
|||
|
—.35 44,7 80 53 195
|
|||
|
—.40°' 39,8 72 52 94°
|
|||
|
~.45 35.5 Ad 46 33
|
|||
|
~ 2 50: - 31.6 57 41 74
|
|||
|
-.55 28,2 51 37 Ae
|
|||
|
~ .60-- (2 stops) 25.1 45 33 5a
|
|||
|
~ 45 22,4 40 29 53
|
|||
|
~.70 ° 20 36 26 A7
|
|||
|
~.75 17,8 32 23 42
|
|||
|
“.80-: 15.8 29 20 37
|
|||
|
™~,BS 14.1 25 18 33
|
|||
|
(2 FR > ™~.90 (3 stops) 12.6 23 1A 30
|
|||
|
~.95 11.2 20.2 15 26
|
|||
|
™ 4,00: - 10 18 13 24
|
|||
|
ee ™1.05 8.91 16 12 21
|
|||
|
ad 1.10: - 7.94 14.2 19 19 |
|
|||
|
1.15 7.08 12.7 2 17 |
|
|||
|
. ™“1.20.-(4 stops) 6,31 11.4 3 15
|
|||
|
1.25 5.62 10.1 7 13
|
|||
|
~. ™1.30° 5.01 9 7 12
|
|||
|
13s 4,47 B 2 11
|
|||
|
“1. 40 3.98 7.2 G 9
|
|||
|
™ 1,45. *~ 3.55 6.4 5 3 5
|
|||
|
1.50 (5 stops) 3.15 5.7 4 7 .
|
|||
|
~~
|
|||
|
2:00
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
16
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
IMAGE SUPERPOSITION In an overall combination of two images, the two
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
can infuse each other as lightness or as darkness,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
or they can be slapped onto each other. There are
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
three basic types of image superposition, named
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
according to how they are made.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Pictures A & B combined by...
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(1) Double exposure from positives. The print film
|
|||
|
is eared twice, once from A's positive, once
|
|||
|
from B's positive.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(2) Double exposure fron mepetizes: The print film
|
|||
|
Ts expose wice, once from A 8 negative, once
|
|||
|
from B's negative.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(3) Bipack. Two films, either A's and B's positives,
|
|||
|
Or é6lee A's and B's negatives, are inserted
|
|||
|
together in the printer gate. The print film
|
|||
|
4s exposed once, from this pair.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The print film is unspecified. It is in the final
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
positive print that the three types of combination
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
are compared, and they look very different. For
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
B&W the differences can be described by how tones
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
combine.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With (t}, lightness dominates. Where one tone
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
combines with another tone the result is nearly
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the lighter of the two tones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With (2), darkness dominates. The result ia nearly
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the darker of the two tones.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
———=> With (3), there is contrastification which complicates
|
|||
|
the tone combination. If a bipack is examined ray
|
|||
|
(unprinted) wherever both images are clear the bipaer
|
|||
|
4a clear. Wherever either image is black the bipack
|
|||
|
4s at least that black. Wherever both images are
|
|||
|
black the bipack is doubly black. The bipack, whiob
|
|||
|
appears dark, has a tonal range doubling that of the
|
|||
|
single images. The bipack is wprintable in toto.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
To abstract a pioture from the unprintable bipack
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
printing exposure is typically increased 1-4 atops.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With 4 stops increase, where clear and black eoincide
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
printe as a dark grey would—not 4 clear domination
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
of either lightness or darkness. With 2 stops increase
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
there is darkness domination.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
GaMMa ¢ BIPACK If the bipack is printed onto gamma $ material, to reduce
|
|||
|
the contrast to normal, it is a true tonal blender,
|
|||
|
without dowinance, of the two images. As the graphs below
|
|||
|
show, the gamma # bipack ia the mean between the type (1)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
~ and type (2) double exposures.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
INCIDENTALLY A type (3) of a type (1) and a type (2) le just a type (3)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
again.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
r. a a
|
|||
|
17
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Four idealized graphs summarize the three basic types of
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
superposition and the gamma # bipack.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Example: 4 has density .75 and B has denaity 1.75 in one
|
|||
|
place. From the first graph, the double exposure
|
|||
|
from positives has density about 1.0 in that place.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
as Pous exfosup am Foss as BiPACK. (10 Come
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
as Me de
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
is ib fo]
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
je ia
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
cy -
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
e
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
5 = io LS ts a: Sg = he Lf wt as
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Ly Ltt L Pi 5 A ‘a 2 2 APPA L elie
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
= i wat
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ae Le
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
‘ly \ WX |
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Fo x7 14 ie to as 85 e 2 4 20 oe
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For a double exposure it doesn’t matter which exposure is
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
first, or what time separates the two. In some multi-head
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
optical printers, using 4 bean-splitter, the two exposures
|
|||
|
are simultaneous. Kither way, the two filma can be
|
|||
|
independently adjusted for exposure, filtered, etc.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For a bipack it doesn't matter which film ie in front. Also
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the two may be optically instead of mechanically bipacked.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In some multi-head optical printers the films are in separate
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
~gates, ones projection becoming the other's illumination. Ir
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a simple printer one film may be in the gate and the other in
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
the camera, in front of the print film. Any Way, the two
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
films ehare one exposure adjustment and filtration.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
18
|
|||
|
When filmwe will be physically bipacked they should firet
|
|||
|
be wiped with a lubricating film cleaner. This ie good
|
|||
|
practice for all optical printing when delicate originals
|
|||
|
receive heavy handling.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EXPOSURE COMPENSATION For superpositions from random pictorial originale:
|
|||
|
For double exposures, the typical exposure adjustment
|
|||
|
is one stop of decrease from normal, during each
|
|||
|
exposure.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
With this adjustment a double exposure of
|
|||
|
picture A with picture A ie the Bame as a
|
|||
|
single normal exposure of A.
|
|||
|
For bipacks there ie no recipe. Expoaure adjustment
|
|||
|
ie extremely dependent on whioh tones coincide with
|
|||
|
which. The adjustment is an increase from normal.
|
|||
|
In ignorance of the originals (why?) and ignorance
|
|||
|
of the intentions (why?) guess 2% stops increase.
|
|||
|
No exposure adjustment can make a bipack of
|
|||
|
picture A with picture A the same as picture
|
|||
|
A printed the same. But a gamma $ bipack of
|
|||
|
picture A with picture A is the same a6 picture .
|
|||
|
SPECIAL ORIGINALS For superpositions not from random pictorial originals
|
|||
|
tones might not combine at all. One image might fall
|
|||
|
on the other's black, or clear, and exposure compensation
|
|||
|
48 different, perhaps unnecessary.
|
|||
|
With special, rigged, originale superposition is not
|
|||
|
image combination in the earlier sense but image
|
|||
|
apportionment -- implantings and supplantings.
|
|||
|
The rulee of tone combination etill apply, but trivially,
|
|||
|
and a eimpler logic prevails.
|
|||
|
Double exposing from positives, where one image is
|
|||
|
——_>> black the other image appears, unaffected by the doubie
|
|||
|
exposure, Where one image is very light it appears,
|
|||
|
hardly affected by the double exposure.
|
|||
|
Double exposing from negatives, where one image (the
|
|||
|
picture, not the film) ie clear the other image appears,
|
|||
|
unaffected by the double exposure.
|
|||
|
Bipacking, where one image is any even tone, the other
|
|||
|
image appears, unaffected exoept for brightness. The
|
|||
|
clear parts of one film are windowa for the other film.
|
|||
|
But it is possible, with enough extra exposure, to
|
|||
|
force one image through the blackened window of the other
|
|||
|
The most extreme cases of rigged originals involve high
|
|||
|
contrast masks, Gisoussed below.
|
|||
|
TEXTURING In~a bipack, an image.of a plain white eurface, showing just
|
|||
|
= ite texture, imparte this texture to the other image.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
19
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MULTI-EXPOBURE Triple, quadruple, etc. multiple exposures are made
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
similarly to double exposures. If there would be 5
|
|||
|
exposurea from the same or nearly the same original,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
then each should receive 1/5 normal exposure. From
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Chart C, 1/5 of full shutter equals ND.70 compensation.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
eat lizely the originals are special, and the compensation
|
|||
|
ess,
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
MULTI-PAck Tripacks, quadripacks, etc. are unmanageable in simple optical
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
printers. For suob effects intermediate prints must be made.
|
|||
|
For example, to quadripack A,B,0,D make printed bipacks of
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A with B and C with Dand bipack these two printe. The order
|
|||
|
of the originals doesn't matter.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
NATURAL SUPERPOSITION Of the three types only (1), the double exposure
|
|||
|
from positives, corresponds to possible camera origina:
|
|||
|
4n original double exposure made from two real scenes
|
|||
|
la practically the same as a printer double exposure
|
|||
|
made from positive images of the acenes.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Type (2), the double exposure from negatives, ia
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
an artifact of the "log linear" response of negative
|
|||
|
films.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Type (3), the bipack, is an artifact of the
|
|||
|
transparency of film images, at least one of then.
|
|||
|
Type (1) 16 nature's super. Preasing one eyeball
|
|||
|
produces such superpositions.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FLASHING Double exposing an image with no image -- sere light -- lightens
|
|||
|
(or with colored light and color print filma, colors) the blacks
|
|||
|
and darker tones while having little effect on middle tones
|
|||
|
and even lese on lights. It is8 not a true method of contrast
|
|||
|
reduction.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Sepia toning can be simulated by both color flashing and color
|
|||
|
filtering when printing B&W original onto color reversal print filr
|
|||
|
A healthy yellow, magenta, or cyan flash when printing onto color
|
|||
|
reversal film yields, respectively, the yellow, magenta, or cyan ~
|
|||
|
image, as if this dye layer were prised from the original film.
|
|||
|
There ie no photographic method for unflashing a flashed image.
|
|||
|
There is image addition (double exposure} and image pultipliocation
|
|||
|
(Dipack) and even image division (bipack of positive with
|
|||
|
negative), but no image subtraction.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CONTRAST ADJUSTMENT Gammas add or subtract in a bipack, so bipacking
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
can adjust contrast. A bipack (printed gamma 1 or
|
|||
|
Viewed raw) of an original with its duplicate is
|
|||
|
like a double contrast original. <A bipack of an
|
|||
|
original with its low contrast negative is like
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
~ a darkened reduced contrast original.
|
|||
|
“fhe bipack of an original with ite high contrast
|
|||
|
negative is like a Sabattier solarization!
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
20
|
|||
|
COLOR IMAGE SUPERPOSITION There are the same three basic types.
|
|||
|
Double exposure from positives gives additive
|
|||
|
color mixture.
|
|||
|
Bipacking gives so-called subtractive color
|
|||
|
mixture. Uwnen bipacking color negatives the
|
|||
|
extra orange mask should be neutralized by
|
|||
|
filtering.)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from negatives gives something
|
|||
|
else.
|
|||
|
For greys in the two images, combination 1s
|
|||
|
as for B&W. But for colors, not only are new
|
|||
|
colors produced but apparent brightnesses do
|
|||
|
not combine quite the same ae for B&W.
|
|||
|
The dyea in Wratten CC filters Y,H,C are
|
|||
|
aimilar to those in color filma. Film colora
|
|||
|
can be simulated by packs of these filters and
|
|||
|
much can be learned about film color manipulation
|
|||
|
from familiarity with the filters and their
|
|||
|
combinations.
|
|||
|
Exapple 1: Image & is orange (CC200Y+CC100M)
|
|||
|
Image B ts blue (CCtO00M+CC200C)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from poaitives gives a raspberry
|
|||
|
color (CC7OM+4ND. 30)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from negatives givee a fairly dark
|
|||
|
greyish green (CC7OY+CC70C4ND1.00)
|
|||
|
Bipack, with 3 stop exposure compensation, gives a
|
|||
|
middie grey (ND1t.10)
|
|||
|
Example 2: Image A is maximum red (CC250Y+CC250M)
|
|||
|
Image B is maximum green (CC250Y+CC250C)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from positives gives yellow (CC220Y+ND.5
|
|||
|
Double exposure from negatives givee black (CC30Y+ND2. 20
|
|||
|
Bipack, with 3 stop exposure compensation, gives
|
|||
|
brown (CC9OY+NDt.60)
|
|||
|
Example 3: Image A is a flesh (CC30Y+CC20M+CC10C)
|
|||
|
Image B ia sky (CC6OM+CC80C)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from positives gives Neola yecckeeoosec)
|
|||
|
Double exposure from negatives gives cc18y+CC45M+Cc58C
|
|||
|
Bipack, with 1 stop exposure compensation, gives
|
|||
|
( CCSOM+CC60C)
|
|||
|
WEIGHTED DOUBLE EXPOSURES In double and other multiple exposures there is
|
|||
|
~ no need to have the several exposures equal. To
|
|||
|
plan Weighted multi-exposures, work in shutter
|
|||
|
angles allotted to each original. Typically the
|
|||
|
total will be full shutter. Shutter angles can
|
|||
|
be converted to ND's using Chart C.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
DISSOLVES A diesolve begins with one picture. Then a second picture
|
|||
|
gradually appears, all over the frame, shares the frame with
|
|||
|
the firat picture, and gradually replaces it.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
The traditional dissolve i8 a simultaneous (double exposed)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
linear fadeout of the firat image and linear fadein of the
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
second, made from positive images.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A simultaneous log fadeout and log fadein makes quite a lumpy
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
dissolve (becoming dark midway, from positive images).
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Regular dissolves are planned as if for variable shuttere. At
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
each frame the ahutter angles for the two exposures must sun
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
to the full shutter angle. ND equivalents can be found in
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Chart C and ND filters can be used to make the dlasolve.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
It 18 not necessary for the fadeout and the fadein to be the
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
same or even of the same type. <Any chosen fadeout has a
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
complementary fadein (found by subtractions from full shutter
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
angle), and vice veraa.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
A diseolve from negative originals is made by pretending they
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
are positives and following the method for positives. No
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
dissolve made from negative originale will look the same as
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a dissolve made from the corresponding positive originals.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
EFFECTS DISSOLVES Diseolves are great emoothers, not only between scenes
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
but between "“effecta".
|
|||
|
For example, a dissolve between a picture illuminated
|
|||
|
through one color filter and the same (synchronized)
|
|||
|
picture illuminated through another color filter makes
|
|||
|
a slur of colorations -- a straight line course through
|
|||
|
color space -- between the two.
|
|||
|
A dissolve between a picture positive and the same
|
|||
|
(synchronized) picture negative forma a pictorial
|
|||
|
bridge from positive to negative. The bridge ia of
|
|||
|
strange stuff. The all-grey picture is not on the way.
|
|||
|
The mentioned strange atuff is reminiscent of Sabattier
|
|||
|
solarization again. The double exposure of a picture
|
|||
|
with its negative, preferably onto contrasty filo,
|
|||
|
gives a reversing tonality: Dark things become lighter
|
|||
|
than middle tone things, which remain darker than light
|
|||
|
things.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
FADES FROM NEGATIVE If a diasolve ie made between a negative original
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
and a clear {or orange) film the result resembles
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
a fadeout. For the fadeocut to resemble a log fadeout
|
|||
|
a special dissolve ta required. The clear film ia
|
|||
|
faded in approximately logarithmically, and the
|
|||
|
negative is faded out couplementarily.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
22
|
|||
|
COLOR EXPOSURE The earlier discussione of exposure apply as well to
|
|||
|
color printing except that now color and brightness are
|
|||
|
adjustable. The adjustments are made primarily with
|
|||
|
cco filters and ND filitere.
|
|||
|
A CCY-- filter worke roughly like an ND.-- filter on
|
|||
|
just the blue part of the spectrum, while not affecting
|
|||
|
the rest of the epectrum. Similarly a CCM filter cuts
|
|||
|
the green and a CCC filter cute the red. ND filters
|
|||
|
could be eliminated by CC filters. For example, ND.30
|
|||
|
4a roughly CC30Y+CC30M+CC30C. This elimination ie
|
|||
|
seldom practical and slightly inferior spectrally.
|
|||
|
Color adjustments are made secondarily with UV filters,
|
|||
|
IR filters, and band rejection filters.
|
|||
|
As with B&W, correction of misexposed originals ehould
|
|||
|
be done in earlier rather than later printing stepa-
|
|||
|
TESTING For a general color exposure determination, the test original
|
|||
|
should be a well-exposed film of the relevant kind, preferably
|
|||
|
with large areas of pear-neutral mid-tones.-
|
|||
|
Jointly varying cC and ND filtration, a long series of test
|
|||
|